Comparison of HPC architectures for computing all-pairs shortest paths : Intel Xeon Phi KNL vs NVIDIA Pascal
Material type:
Item type | Home library | Collection | Call number | URL | Status | Date due | Barcode | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
Biblioteca de la Facultad de Informática | Biblioteca digital | A1179 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Link to resource | No corresponde |
Formato de archivo PDF. -- Este documento es producción intelectual de la Facultad de Informática - UNLP (Colección BIPA/Biblioteca)
Today, one of the main challenges for high-performance computing systems is to improve their performance by keeping energy consumption at acceptable levels. In this context, a consolidated strategy consists of using accelerators such as GPUs or many-core Intel Xeon Phi processors. In this work, devices of the NVIDIA Pascal and Intel Xeon Phi Knights Landing architectures are described and compared. Selecting the Floyd-Warshall algorithm as a representative case of graph and memory-bound applications, optimized implementations were developed to analyze and compare performance and energy efficiency on both devices. As it was expected, Xeon Phi showed superior when considering double-precision data. However, contrary to what was considered in our preliminary analysis, it was found that the performance and energy efficiency of both devices were comparable using single-precision datatype.
Congreso Argentino de Ciencias de la Computación (CACIC) (26to : 2020 : San Justo, Argentina)